What is one of the criticisms of the Neo-Marxist view of crime?

The criticism regarding Neo-Marxism being overly deterministic and lacking practical application stems from the approach that views individuals largely as products of their social and economic environments, emphasizing structural factors. This perspective can downplay the agency of individuals, suggesting that their choices and actions are primarily dictated by the conditions of capitalism and social class. Critics argue that this deterministic viewpoint can oversimplify the complexity of human behavior and fails to take into account the diverse motivations and decisions that affect criminal behavior.

Additionally, the lack of practical application is seen in how Neo-Marxist theories may not offer concrete solutions or strategies for addressing crime within society. Rather than providing actionable insights or methods for reforming the system, Neo-Marxist critiques tend to focus on broad sociopolitical critiques without necessarily translating them into practical steps for change or direct interventions in crime prevention or justice policy.

Other perspectives, while they might focus on issues of economic inequality or cultural influences, do not carry the same level of emphasis on determinism and practical implications as identified in the Neo-Marxist critique. Thus, the criticism pointing to determinism and the absence of pragmatic solutions highlights significant limitations within the Neo-Marxist framework regarding crime.