What does Snider argue about the capitalist state in relation to business regulations?

Snider argues that the capitalist state is often reluctant to pass laws that threaten the profitability of businesses. This perspective highlights how the state tends to prioritize the interests of the business sector, as it is seen as essential for economic growth and stability. The rationale is that businesses contribute to the economy by creating jobs and generating tax revenue, which can influence policymakers to avoid regulations that may hinder business operations or reduce profits.

This argument underscores a critical aspect of the relationship between the state and capital, indicating that regulatory frameworks tend to be developed with the intention of supporting business interests rather than strictly enforcing social or environmental standards. Therefore, Snider illustrates the tension between regulation and the economic motivation of the state, suggesting that lawmakers may act in ways that protect business profitability, which ultimately shapes the landscape of business regulations.